Now, I am a Christian, but I read this article about Alcoholics Anonymous and why some Atheists think it is a cult, and I have to say I agree. I started to feel this way when last year I moved in with a roommate who insisted I needed AA, despite the fact that I literally have less then 1 drink a month. She kept telling me I needed "spiritual healing" and I thought "no, I don’t, I have all the spirit I need".
I don’t know. I have just met a lot of people who have been in AA or NA and it seems like they are all brain washed. Most of them will insist you are an addict, even if you don’t drink or do drugs and they will just tell you that you are in denial if you disagree.
What do you think?
http://www.positiveatheism.org/rw/ofcourse.htm
I’m a former alcoholic and was an AA member for nine years.
Based on my experience, yes, I believe that AA is a cult. The philosophy of the group is that the individual is powerless and needs to surrender to a "higher power" ("God as I understand him") in order to recover. This very idea keeps people sick and tied to the group forever, where they often (not always) become isolated, inbred and brainwashed.
I agree with Taf that many AA members are perfectly well meaning people. However, their good intentions do not mean that the group is not a cult. I imagine that many of the members of FLDS are well meaning too and truly believe they are practicing God’s will, just like the Jim Jones folks etc. It isn’t intent that counts, it’s outcome.
Which brings me to the next point. While the cult question is interesting, it evades the real issue which is whether or not AA actually works as advertised. Here, the answer is clear: NO.
Take a look at the following website, which contains a thorough complilation of the research regarding the effectiveness of AA. It is very eye opening. There’s some information on the cult question, too, on the site:
http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-effectiveness.html
